Having
been raised in a suburban, lower-middle class Irish Catholic family in New
England has certainly impacted my worldview, particularly as it relates to
issues of religion and sexual and reproductive health issues. In fact, my experiences related to religion
are what ultimately “called” me to study and work in sexual health specifically,
and not reproductive health. I was
raised in a family that never questioned the Faith, nor talked about it in relation
to other faith beliefs. There were
certain expectations that went along with being Catholic, having to do with
sex, gender, and relationships. Although I knew these silent yet steadfast
expectations, I questioned my acceptance of these tenets even as a teenager.
I’m the first to admit my
privilege, and to be completely transparent, I’m a white, upper middle class,
cis gender, heterosexual female with undergraduate and Ivy League graduate
school degrees. I am also cynical, jaded, hardened, pragmatic, and sarcastic. I’m a divorced, 35 year old recovering
Catholic from the Northeast, now living in a large urban city, and identify as
a Secular Humanist. I am in a loving
relationship with an amazing man, 19 years my senior. Other than being a woman
(which is a challenge unto itself), I’ve got a lot of privilege. My struggles
are my own, but I know others have endured far more than I.
When I was about 13, my
mom gave me a stack of readers and pamphlets about my body and puberty, told me
to look through them, and to come back to her if I had any questions. I only
had one question, which came after watching a cartoon video on puberty. It was
about how girls masturbate. I was too embarrassed to ask her in person, so I
wrote a note. I never got a reply. Really,
the only other question I asked was a personal one, to my mom. I said, “Can I
ask you a personal question? Did you and Dad have sex before you were married?”
Her answer: “That is a personal
question.”
Everything else I learned
about sex came from school and from friends. The internet wasn’t really
something you surfed for answers in those days. I remember as a middle-schooler,
seeing one 8th grade couple making out in the hall way- all the
time. When they broke up, it was the talk of the century. I had major,
heart-wrenchingly intense, unrequited crushes on boys. I remember having only one sex ed class in
high school- 9th grade, I think, and it was about reproduction and
abstinence. I was in a class with all girls, and the boys were getting educated
in the room next door. I was a good
girl. I called myself “Halo Head.” I was a good Catholic girl and my plan was
to wait until I got married to have sex. (Ok, so I didn’t wait until I was
married, but I did wait until I was
engaged).
My parlay into sexual
discourse and awareness grew from the socially acceptable expectation that all
girls will eventually experience pregnancy, and the socially vilified reality
of sexual assault. I remember feeling
“those feelings down there” when I’d read books or watch shows involving
childbirth or rape. Childbirth. Rape. Even writing this, I think, how creepy is
that?!? But, these passages and scenes were not stigmatized as “dirty” or porn,
only natural and horrible, respectively. The common thread between child birth and
rape is sex. Later, as an adult, in
thinking about how my interest in sexuality began, I felt angry and ashamed
that it was linked prominently to pain and violence, and not pleasure. My interest was steeped in stigma and shame.
My access to positive messages of sex and relationships was censored and oppressed
by my religious upbringing. Don’t even get me started on my love affair with
the Thorn Birds.
I moved away from my family and
childhood home in suburban Connecticut when I was 18, and moved to rural North
Carolina, where I lived for 13 years. I chose to attend Lenoir-Rhyne College, a
small, private, Lutheran school, because of their unique and renowned program
for Deaf Education. Those choices led me through the formative years of my
life; I was out on my own, making decisions, and determining and defining my
values. Immediately, I noticed that
religion was undeniably prevalent. Signs and billboards touted Jesus and Bible
verses, abiding worshipers stood on highway medians preaching into the open
windows of passing cars, and business meetings began with prayer. I was approached on numerous occasions by
people asking me where I attended church - then either shunned or considered a
potential convert when I told them I was Catholic. “So you’re not Christian,” they’d say. I could be “born
again,” a concept foreign to me.
Such confrontations about
religion and vocation forced me to reckon with my own faith, in particular
those tenets that had social and political implications. The Catholic faith clearly defines its views
on issues related to sexuality, including premarital sex, homosexuality,
contraception, abortion, masturbation, and gender roles in relationships, just
as clearly as it defines the guilt associated with the abandonment of these
definitions. My foundation was unquestionably firm until I began to see the
gender inequities and discrepancies between my faith and my career path.
I broke away from the confines
of Catholicism, and organized religion in general, and have dealt with the
repercussions ever since. I was challenged by religion’s pervasiveness within
professional and social outlets within the “Bible Belt.” My
reactions to religion became defensive and negative. My work in teen pregnancy prevention;
HIV/AIDS; and sexual and reproductive health advocacy made my time in the rural
southeast an eye-opening and challenging experience.
In the
area of sexuality education, often local and regional legislation determines
what you can and cannot say in the classroom. Teaching
“abstinence-only-until-marriage” sex education classes and condom failure rates
is a denial of the facts and reality of teen sexual initiation. This type of
education works against itself when youth choose not to use condoms upon their
sexual debut because they believe what they’ve been taught, ultimately increasing
infection rates and unintended pregnancies.
In addition, an entire population of students is made
invisible and silenced by the abstinence only until marriage message. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer,
and questioning (LGBTQQ) youth have very few (although ever-increasing) options
for considering the notion of marriage in their lives, and are hardly ever
included in educational conversations and settings about sexuality. The idea
that students need only be taught about abstinence and nothing else further
perpetuates the stigma of sex and sexuality, of sex as solely procreative,
silences LGBTQQ students, and erases women’s sexual pleasure from the
conversation.
In 2002, the World Health
organization organized a meeting in Geneva to discuss and further define Sexual
Health. The attendees came up with the following guide (emphasis is my own):
“Sexual health is a state
of physical, emotional, mental and social well-being
in relation to sexuality; it is not
merely the absence of disease, dysfunction or infirmity. Sexual health
requires a positive and respectful
approach to sexuality and sexual relationships, as well as the possibility of
having pleasurable and safe sexual
experiences, free of coercion,
discrimination and violence.”
Despite this positive and open-minded
approach to sexual health, the United States’ proclivity to limit and oppress
access to sexuality information and education, through the promulgation of
religious and cultural expectations has significant emotional, mental, and
physical consequences. Sexuality and health are the foundation of our being and
yet in the South and in many other areas of our country, parents, teachers,
clergy, doctors, clinicians, and even pharmacists refuse to accept that sex is
natural and normal, putting their morality onto the lives of their children,
students, congregants, patients, and clients. The effect of inhibiting
discussions of sex, identity, and health is detrimental to the overall health,
well-being, and stability of a person and society as a whole. My
liberal values for social, sexual and reproductive justice and gender equality
were tested daily in this conservative Christian part of the country. There, and even now in my urban city, I
continue to see the increasing influence of religion on politics and funding
streams regarding the sexual and reproductive issues I support.
Now, I work in the
abortion field, implementing training and education opportunities for abortion
care providers. Part of my job is to
provide values clarification and pregnancy options counseling training to those
working with women who seek abortion care or support. Inevitably, the recurring
challenge that counselors face is working with religious patients. The skill of
the counselor is to meet the patient where they are in their belief system.
Helping the patient create a space in their faith where their god provides them
with comfort and acceptance rather than shame and guilt can be transformative
for the patient. Although abortion is couched within the reproductive health
and justice movements, I see abortion as the bridge from reproductive health to
sexual health. Abortion enables women to maintain their autonomy as sexual
beings, undoing the expectation that they will, or should, parent. Coming from my upbringing, I never really
thought that I would be working in abortion.
But here I am, and I believe in its morality.
Despite
my personal struggles with religion and faith, I very firmly recognize the
intrigue that religion holds for me, especially with regard to issues of sexual
and reproductive health, and its influence on the choices people make. I am also painfully aware of my knee-jerk
emotional reactions to religion and its pervasiveness in the social constructs
of our society. Still,
we need to fight as a society to answer these questions: What does an individual need to be a healthy,
well-rounded, confident sexual being?
How can society overcome religious stigma and understand the
complexities of sexuality with compassion and acceptance? How can we educate and empower women and men
to love themselves without the detrimental comparison to unrealistic ideals set
forth by society, the media, and religion?
How do we do all of this while still maintaining the integrity of a
culture and community of people and their unique and diverse beliefs?
My work in teen sex ed
and pregnancy prevention, HIV/AIDS, and abortion has focused my passion on the
sexual being of humans, by way of stigma. My experiences showed me that I was
advocating for a person who happened to have an STI, who happened to be
pregnant, who happened to have HIV, or who happened to be gay. My passion was in supporting this person,
who, because they are a sexual human being, was now being treated with hatred,
discrimination, and condemnation. I
studied sexuality and health because a person is first a sexual being (from
birth!), before they are a reproductive person (if at all!). Sexuality encompasses the continuums of one’s
sex, gender, orientation, sexual behavior, sexual health, and sexual rights.
The binaries of sex, gender, and orientation that our society so loves and
finds so comforting reduces us to the moral panics that devolve into ideological rhetoric
at religious and political bully pulpits.
No comments:
Post a Comment